Three points of interest I’ve stumbled upon concerning the G20 Summit, happening in Toronto, this weekend…
- First the sweeping power police have been “temporarily” granted. According to The Toronto Star, “[t]he province has secretly passed an unprecedented regulation that empowers police to arrest anyone near the G20 security zone who refuses to identify themselves or agree to a police search.”
But not only that, this regulation “was made under Ontarioâ€™s Public Works Protection Act and was not debated in the Legislature [yay democracy!]. According to a provincial spokesperson, the cabinet action came in response to an â€œextraordinary requestâ€ by Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair. […]Â The regulation kicked in Monday and will expire June 28, the day after the summit ends. While the new regulation appeared without notice on the provinceâ€™s e-Laws online database last week, it wonâ€™t be officially published in The Ontario Gazette until July 3 â€” one week after the regulation expires.”
- The Security wall erected to “protect” the world “leaders” from protestors. I think the much more relevant question is, where the hell is our protection, from them? But beside the point.
Stephan Christoff (in his interview on today’s Democracy Now broadcast) said that the “three-layer massive security fence around downtown, [was] constructed by a corporation, SNC-Lavalin from Montreal.” The very same Canadian corporation who “produced millions of bullets between 2003 and 2005 for the U.S. Army at the same time of the invasion of Iraq.” Shocking. That is if you’ve never read Yves Engler’s book The Black Book of Canadian Foreign Policy, where he details this (I believe), and a number of other instances, where Canada’s was and is, most definitely, involved in the invasion and occupation ofÂ Iraq.
And, “bringing it home,” Stephan went onto say “[s]o this is a corporation thatâ€™s inherently tied to the military-industrial complex internationally and also has been tied to the clampdown on dissent here in Toronto.”
- And, lastly, the emphasis on violence, and its condemnation in relation to the protests, by my Government, specifically. This is something I made passing reference to in my previous post, the absurd irony of it all. Let’s see, it’s perfectly acceptable for the G20 to turn around and use the very thing they “deplore” to implement the same policies people are protesting?
I don’t know about you, but this is so very interesting, not to mention incredibly damning…